Seven Things to Do Before Using aLEAP

This image says "u know what"

If you haven’t applied behavioral science principles and data for awhile, you might be surprised that you already use them. They account for learning from your lessons. It’s simple to refine your use in order to increase learning by students.

aLEAP (A Learning Efficiency Analysis Paradigm) identifies a finite set of essential options for teachers to use for that result. It’s good to have a shopping plan before starting to use aLEAP. Here are 7 things to do first.

1. Start with a quick 101

To make sure you use your effort to the best use of your students’ time, refresh your use of behavioral science vocabulary and logic for learning. They’re like knowing gas mileage and maintenance costs when you shop for a car.

In short, learning means that someone has changed behavior patterns after an observable event, such as instruction. Observers see, hear, etc. a behavior pattern before and after the event.

That is all anyone can say with replicable confidence about learning. The rest is speculation based on inferences from a pool of assumptions, beliefs, and hopes.

In the end, that’s how others test you and your students, because that’s all anyone else can do, irrespective of whatever you speculate about what learning “really means.”

Of course, you have a lot of options online to get you back up to speed with applications of behavioral science descriptions.

2. Shift conversations from colloquialisms to descriptions

Talk, write, plan and report descriptions of behavior patterns you use to change behavior patterns of others. This takes practice and self restraint. It’s like practicing scales on the piano. That’s how the best teachers and pianists become the best. For teachers, avoid using more common ways of characterizing lessons, learning, and assessment of academic performance.

One of the most difficult shifts for some educators is avoiding references to belief systems about schooling, such as using words authentic, cooperation, collaboration, competition, education, real, students, and true.

Instead, describe what you do to change behavior patterns of learners with whom you work. Leave the rest to theologians, philosophers, and politicians.

3. Count

Count, record, and compare counts to identify changes in your and your students’ behavior patterns. Without this sequence, you are just guessing about the impact of your lesson on learning.

To start, count whatever you choose in your lesson. For example, count the number of seconds your lesson takes for the first and the last student to meet criterion. Count the number of steps you describe during a lesson for students to use in solving a problem.

Then, practice counting. Count the number steps do you make to get from the school office to your classroom; to walk the dog before bed; to do laundry; to fix a lunch. Count the number of seconds you wait at stop lights on the way to school; to brush your teeth in the morning; to fix a cup of coffee; to pour milk into your coffee. Just count until it’s an automatic part of your day, then edit your counting to important things.

Make hash marks to record your counts. Then compare your counts to identify which changes in counts indicate increases in learning. If none appear related, change what you do and count until you find a reliable comparison.

4. Review lessons

Two lessons can seem similar, but one costs learners more clock time and other personal resources to meet criterion. Learners’ clock time and some other learner resources are non-renewable.

Look more closely at your plan and instruction of these lessons to identify differences and how they affect variations in use of learners’ resources. Most lessons appear to use up whatever clock time is assigned.

Check out aLEAP for a quick rundown of essential features learners use to meet criterion for your lessons.

Then, choose how many additional resources you want learners to spend to meet criterion.

5. Upgrade your lessons

Before you decide to continue spending learners’ resources as you have been, check your lesson plans for ways to upgrade your instruction. Make it more efficient.

For example, reduce the clock time for a lesson by 60 seconds. It’s that simple. If you’re up to a challenge, reduce it by 120 seconds today and another 120 seconds tomorrow and decrease the number of steps learners must take to solve a problem.

To start, increase the number of redundant visual and auditory cues you offer during instruction. It’s less expensive for learners when you increase cues than learners failing to meet criterion.

If you’re up for upgrading, make sure learners meet each lesson criterion faster and with fewer trials-and-errors while using fewer personal resources.

6. Know your options

Educators choose options for lessons from a pool of speculation and databased descriptions of content.

They then link these options to speculation and databased descriptions of how people learn.

From a learners’ view, irrespective of options educators choose, lessons do not come with a warranty. Doing what an instructor says to do is a gamble of their personal resources in exchange for vague allusions to promises of possible future benefits.

Review your options from this learners’ view. Changes in the number of learners meeting criterion for each lesson will tell you how relevant your choices are to their view.

7. Return policy and implementation support

Before you buy into your choices for a lesson, review the likely results your students will give you.

Use the number of students meeting criterion from the last time you instructed the lesson as a baseline.

Write down the number of learners you expect to meet criterion this time. Consider what choices you made in the lesson this time make it more likely that more learners will meet criterion than last time.

Consider whether you can increase the number by one more than your first choice for this lesson. Two more?

Consider what about your lesson does not allow all learners to meet criterion and how you will avoid that problem the next time you offer this lesson.

Identify support you will seek to upgrade your lesson further, so that all learners will meet criterion next time.

Got it? Great! Here’s how to continue increasing learning from your lessons

Congratulations for taking steps to apply behavioral science descriptions of what learners do to learn.

Once you’ve developed your perfect lesson and instruction plan, you can use these same steps to upgrade more lessons.

You’ll likely find that your students learn more academic content than previously. You’ll also find that you use more time planning than learners spend meeting criterion for a lesson.

The payoff for you is that you can repeat upgraded lessons with similar or improved results without the same amount of front time.

Watch for more suggestions for increasing learning. Take aLEAP!

Related Resources

aLEAP

New Era School Initiative (NESI)

Also, check the categories of posts on this site for links to more descriptions of how others apply behavioral science descriptions of learning.

Posted in aLEAP, Checklists, Learning Centered Attention, New Era School Initiative (NESI) | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Learn More through Direct Instruction

Peter E. Peterson posted “Eighth-Grade Students Learn More Through Direct Instruction.” He reviewed the recently published study that concluded that DI students learned one (1) to two(2) months more content in an academic year than through constructivist teaching strategists.

Guido Schwerdt and Amelie Wuppermann of the University of Munich figured out a way to test empirically the relative value of … two teaching styles (see “Sage on the Stage,” research) … These analysts took advantage of the … the 2003 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Survey (TIMSS). (It included) … a nationally representative sample of U.S. 8th graders in math and science

It is a read worth your time, if you have any interest or involvement in “education.”

The comments by readers point out the deep divisions and misunderstandings between educators who believe in constructivism and behavioral scientists who generate and apply scientific data concerning education.

I found aLEAP useful for analyzing these differences beyond nominalisms (no disrespect intended to anyone). In general, constructivists do not use behavioral science data that describes how people learn. I’ll say more about these differences later.

Heiny, R.W. aLEAP (Click on the “Labels” prompt in blue at the bottom of this post or on the “post categories” for aLEAP in the right hand column of this blog page.)

Peterson, P.E. Eighth-Grade Students Learn More Through Direct Instruction, EducationNext, Summer 2011 / Vol. 11, No. 3.

Schwerdt, G. and Wuppermann, A. Sage on the Stage, EducationNext, Summer 2011 / Vol. 11, No. 3.

Posted in aLEAP, Reports, Research, Reviews | Leave a comment

Learning for All: Whatever It Takes!

Kudos to educators, support staff, and community members of the Victor Elementary School District (VESD), Victorville, CA. Their motto: “Learning for All: Whatever It Takes!”

They have continued to receive recognition for students earning outstanding academic performance on standardized achievement tests, including the state standards test.

VESD is only a short drive from one of the poorest performing school districts in the state. Both have similar demographics and other challenges.

Their website is a model for providing access to state-of-the-art instruction guides and other curriculum supports for teachers. I especially appreciate the lists of behavioral objectives by grade and subject. Instructors at all levels will find this model useful for identifying minimum performance expectations for learners in their courses.

Keep up the good work! I’ve monitored you for many years. You’ve demonstrated what’s possible with a behavioral approach to schooling. That’s refreshing. I hope others find it refreshingly useful too.

Victor Elementary School District (VESD) Home Page

VDSD Curriculum Home

Posted in Decisive Schools, Learning Centered Attention, Learning Content | Leave a comment

"Crazy U" Online

Andrew Ferguson talks on CSPAN today about writing his book “Crazy U: One Dad’s Crash Course in Getting His Kid Into College.” Ferguson is senior editor at the Weekly Standard.

The book humorously follows Dad through the process of getting his son accepted into college.

He describes taking the SATs, the application process, visiting colleges, and applying for financial assistance.

Prior to his position at the Weekly Standard, Andrew Ferguson wrote for Time Magazine and Washingtonian magazine. He has written columns for Fortune, Forbes FYI, National Review, Commentary, and TV Guide. During a portion of the George H.W. Bush administration, he was a White House speechwriter.

This is a must view for anyone thinking that they might become involved in the college selection and application process. It’s a highly competitive process on the brink of becoming even more brutal for those not prepared for its rigors.

Having spent most of several decades in higher education, I recognize his prose as accurately describing the process used by the most competitive applicants. That means, for those who have the most choices among acceptances from the best colleges.

You can watch the video of Ferguson talking about his book before buying it.

Ferguson, A. (2010). “Crazy U: One Dad’s Crash Course in Getting His Kid Into College.” Video recorded interview by Brian Lamb.

Garner, D. “Application Adventure: A Dad’s College Essay,” A Review

Posted in Choosing Schools, Research, Reviews | Leave a comment

Charles Murrey Describes the Unraveling of America

C-SPAN recorded for reuse a lecture “The State of White America” by political scientist Charles Murrey. He reported more analyses of U.S. Census Bureau Data included in his book “Real Education: Four Simple Truths for Bringing Schools Back to Reality.”

These titles turned me off, but I listened to find out what he had to say. Educators trying to stay informed will find the lecture at least provocatively stimulating.

As have his books, this lecture swims against political correctness. At the same time, he offers a macro view of these empirical data.

Murrey suggests that these data account for what he calls “the unraveling of America” into the upper middle and upper classes that have remained stable since 1960 and the lower classes that are on a rapid decline away from values that make America unique in world history.

This counters current conventional wisdom that the upper classes value “elitist” virtues. But Murrey’s data indicate they are more industrious, honest, religious, self reliant, etc., consistent with virtues of the founders of America.

He also suggests that the middle class (e.g., teachers, white collar workers, bureaucrats, etc.) are trending away from these virtues, but at a slower descending rate than the lower classes.

Leading members of the middle class trending away are 30 to 49 year old white non-Hispanic males. He refers to them as “feckless” and a threat to America’s historic uniqueness.

He ended by say that data for the whole population appears consistent with that of the white population.

Murrey, C. The State of White America. Presented April 4, 2011, American Enterprise Institute. C-SPAN Video Archieves.

Murrey, C. (2008). Real Education: Four Simple Truths for Bringing Schools Back to Reality.

Posted in Learning Content, Reports, Research, Teaching | Leave a comment

Learning Efficiency Quotient

I’m moving ahead with the development of a Learning Efficiency Quotient (LEQ). It provides an evaluation of an instructor and of instruction.

LEQ indicates the relative use of personal resources (time, effort, etc.) by a learner that a lesson requires. This is an index of Predict Learning(TM) (PL). The index is agnostic about views of what constitutes learning and instruction and their costs. It is consistent with the use of Tablet and other mobile communication devices in Decisive Schools of New Era School Initiative (NESI).

I hope you’ll watch for more posts about LEQ and PL developments and when they will be ready for you to test.

Posted in Decisive Schools, Learning Centered Attention, New Era School Initiative (NESI), Teaching Learning Costs | 1 Comment

World’s First Beer to Consume in Space

Astronauts4Hire completed its inaugural test of Vostok Space Beer, the world’s first beer designed for consumption in space.

The experiment took place aboard a parabolic trajectory microgravity flight out of Cape Canaveral, operated by Zero Gravity Corporation (ZERO-G).

The flight on February 26, 2011, was the first in a series of microgravity flights qualifying the beer recipe for consumption in space, funded in part by sales of the beverage on Earth.

The Beer has Landed: Astronauts4Hire Completes Space Beer Microgravity Test

Posted in Learning Content, Research, Sources | Leave a comment

Astronauts4Hire Announces Selection of New Flight Members

Astronauts4Hire Inc. announced the selection of its third class of commercial scientist-astronaut candidates to conduct experiments on suborbital flights.

“With the addition of these new members to the organization, Astronautst4Hire has solidified its standing as the premier provider of scientist-astronaut candidates,” said Astronauts4Hire President Brian Shiro.

Astronauts4Hire Announces Selection of New Flight Members

Posted in Learning Content, Research, Sources | Leave a comment

Lenovo Eye Controlled Laptop

Lenovo partnered with Tobii Technology to launch a fully functional, world’s first eye controlled laptop. They displayed it at CeBIT in Hannover. It relies on the human eyes to point, select and scroll and complements, rather than existing control interfaces.

Special educators and rehab specialists should monitor this development for their students/clients with limited mobility.

Kudos, Lenovo. Thanks for this venture!

Athow, D. World’s First Eye-controlled Laptop Presented At CeBIT 2011. IT ProPortal, March 01, 2011. (Captured March 2, 2011, 8:23 PM.)

Posted in Disabilities, Mobile PC Hardware | Leave a comment

Educational Productivity

Economists at the Center for American Progress announced an online interactive website that compares the educational productivity of 9,000 United States school districts.

In Tablet PC Education Blog words, they addressed the question, “What does it cost to learn ‘a’?”

This report is the culmination of a yearlong effort to study the efficiency of the nation’s public education system and includes the first-ever attempt to evaluate the productivity of almost every major school district in the country.

The report states these observations, based on the study data:

Most states and districts have not done nearly enough to measure or produce the productivity gains our education system so desperately needs.

More education spending will not automatically improve student outcomes.

Highly productive districts are focused on improving student outcomes.

States and districts should report more data on productivity.

Kudos, Center for American Progress economists! Keep up the good work.

Boser, U. Return on Educational Investment
A District-by-District Evaluation of U.S. Educational Productivity
. January 19, 2011. (Captured February 3, 2011, 4:31AM.)

Posted in Competition, Learning Content, Outcomes, Research, Teaching Learning Costs | Leave a comment