aLEAP (a Learning Efficiency Analysis Paradigm) is under development to increase learning with Tablet and other mobile PCs.
This update summarizes responses from reviewers and adjustments to presentations of aLEAP. Adjustments reflect their comments.
Comments from Reviewers
Three sets of reviewers commented about aLEAP: educators, education software developers, and people I’ve asked for comments who have no interest in the project. In general, reviewers find descriptions of aLEAP too dense for quick review. Some have asked for more “friendly” presentations.
Educators in a public school district have used and distributed lesson planning guides based on aLEAP. These products have received mixed reviews ranging from ignoring them to pinning them up in classrooms for reference. The Enhanced Daily Learning Plan was seen attached to classroom walls and in the school district office. A student of one teacher made an eight foot banner featuring the five generic elements of aLEAP for confirming that learning occurred. The teacher attached the banner to a wall above the chalk/whiteboard. Students told the teacher they used these elements to study for tests.
With teachers, we are developing and testing formats based on aLEAP for planning, instructing and evaluating lessons.
An education software developer offered to license for distribution specific products based on aLEAP. Other developers monitor progress of the project.
Other people who have heard or read descriptions of aLEAP do not find it useful or of interest. Many have said in one way or another, “Nobody cares” or “Glad you have a hobby.”
Adjustments in Presentations
A website still under construction includes detailed descriptions of aLEAP. It consists of 200 pages of detailed descriptions, references, and notes as a wiki based online textbook. No launch date for the site has been set yet.
As technical descriptions change, summaries of aLEAP also change. These changes have lead to drafting separate “user friendly” descriptions for people who prefer such references.
Personal Observations
The use of the word learning has again become common in schools, in news/commentary media, and in gossip. It’s easy to speculate that most people know what it means to learn.
After all, we all learn. Billions of dollars are spent annually to encourage it. People spend careers studying it and trying to make it happen. But, can we say how it happens?
So I ask, how do you answer the question I was asked, “Tell me what people do step-by-step to learn that I can observe. Keep it simple.”
By inference, the questioner asked, “What is learning and what are its smallest easily observable elements without which people do not learn?”
I could not come up with a research based answer that held general agreement.
So, I started developing aLEAP as a response to the question. It’s based in part on descriptions of and conversations about Decisive Schools as represented in NESI (the New Era School Initiative). I give priority to what people do to learn rather than to the content of what they learn.
This focus has evolved into a structural-functional description of a research based infrastructure of learning. This approach includes a legacy of critiques of structural-functionalism in the social and behavioral sciences.
Learning
Behaviorists generally use the working definition of learning as the process of changing behavior patterns. Observers can note learners adopting, adapting, or extending these patterns. aLEAP is based on such definitions and observations.
aLEAP
aLEAP is a technical description of learning. It consists of 15 essential elements of behavior patterns people use to learn. All elements have empirical research legacies traceable over more than a century.
Experimental empirical behavioral researchers described these elements in ways for observers to measure their frequencies. Analysts use these frequencies to predict the likelihood of learning occuring. Scientists identified and described elements in laboratories and used them in practical settings to change behavior patterns.
aLEAP is an arrangement of these elements into a sequence that studies indicate people use to learn. Without an element occuring in a lesson or other presentation, people are less likely to learn from it.
Elements of Learning. Each of the 15 elements indicates a choice people make to try to learn. The choice either leads to changing a behavior pattern or it does not.
Therefore, each choice changes the likelihood of a learner reaching a criterion for learning, say, a lesson a teacher offers.
Some of the elements indicate categories of discrete choices. Others indicate generic choices that occur in a variety of expressions.
All are observable and measurable without special equipment.
Together, they describe one step from another in the most efficient sequence people use to learn.
Reaction to aLEAP. An early draft of aLEAP first appeared publically on June 22, 2009. It seemed simple then to state what was to me obvious.
I expected readers, especially educators with advanced degrees and education software developers, to say, “Of course. Tell me something I don’t know.”
That happened, but not from as many people as I expected.
Other educators and developers respond with various versions of “Oh? I don’t believe it. Too simple. Anyway, what’s in it for me? I’m busy.”
Rereading the original post now, it appears as a statement of intent needing further explanation. Development has continued to refine descriptions of elements of learning and to describe how to use these elements to plan and instruct lessons.
Remaining Questions to Address
The biggest question that remains: What presentations of aLEAP do educators and education software developers consider “friendly” enough to get beyond their automatic rejection of facts that learning is a technical process? Many of these people appear to believe that learning occurs, so don’t try to describe it. Don’t pretend anyone can describe it as a formula, algorithm, or other mechanical process. Above all, do not try to replace my professional expertise with non-human ways to create what you call learning.
Demonstrating advantages of aLEAP to educators and to those who distribute learning material to schools poses an equal challenge. aLEAP is learning process centered. Most education programs are learning content centered under a variety of names. Advantages to educators and distributors must overcome the question, “What’s in it for me?” instead of “What’s in it for learners?”
Your comments about aLEAP and its development are solicited and welcome. Thanks for taking time to review this update.
References
Heiny, R. Accelerated K-12 Mobile Learning: Press Release, Tablet PC Education Blog, February 13, 2009. (Captured July 1, 2011, 10:40 AM.)
Heiny, R. aLEAP Toward Automatic Learning Analysis with Tablet PCs Abstract, Tablet PC Education Blog, June 22, 2009. (Captured June 29, 2011, 4:42 PM.)
Heiny, R. Decisive Schools, Tablet PC Education Blog, A category of posts on various dates beginning March 28, 2005. (Captured July 1, 2011, 10:58 AM.)
Heiny, R. & Heiny, L.P. Enhanced Daily Learning Plan, Tablet PC Education Blog, December 28, 2009. (Captured June 30, 2011, 10:27 AM.)
Heiny, R. New Era School Initiative (NESI). Tablet PC Education Blog, A category of posts beginning February 13, 2009. (Captured July 1, 2011, 10:55.)