Yahoo! Funding for Classroom Projects

Each week between August 22 and October 16, 2011, Yahoo! will donate $25,000, or up to $600 each, to the projects that receive the most votes on donorschoose.org. First, post a project so others may view it and select it as their choice for the week. Posting projects and voting on them are both free. Here’s a source for your Tablet PC Education Classroom Project!

Posted in Grants Funding, Mobile PC Learning | Leave a comment

Artificial Neural Network from DNA

Scientists from the California Institute of Technology have created an artificial neural network (a “tiny brain”) from double-stranded DNA molecules with loose ends. These strands interact with biochemical inputs to the loose ends. Outputs serve as both ‘yes’ or ‘no’ indicators.

The artificial neurons can take incomplete inputs, interact with each other, and come up with a complete conclusion.  Developers have used the same principle for computing and robotics.

Caltech Researchers Create the First Artificial Neural Network Out of DNA: Molecular Soup Exhibits Brainlike Behavior. California Institute of Technology News Release, Jul7 20, 2011.

Posted in Factoid, Learning, Research, Vocabulary | Leave a comment

3-D Plasmon Rulers

Scientists at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory have designed a plasmon ruler that can measure nanoscale distances within chemical or biological species. It is based on coupled plasmonic oligomers in combination with high-resolution plasmon spectroscopy. This enables measurement of complex process such as DNA.

The nanometer scale is where the biological and materials sciences converge. It provides more precise measures of minute structural changes and distances.

This scale measures plasmons, or electronic surface waves “generated when light travels through the confined dimensions of noble metal nanopartcles or structures, such as gold or silver.”

“Two noble metallic nanoparticles in close proximity will couple with each other through their plasmon resonances to generate a light-scattering spectrum that depends strongly on the distance between the two nanoparticles,” said Paul Alivisatos, director of the Berkeley Lab and leader of this reseearch.

A great resource article to introduce students to  evolving products and vocabulary in biological and chemical sciences.

References

Taking the 3D Measure of Macromolecules. News Release, Berkeley Lab, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, June 16, 2011. (Captured July 20, 2011, 10:04 AM.)

 

Posted in Learning Content, Research, Sources, Vocabulary | Leave a comment

“What Makes Giftedness?”

“What makes giftedness?” I asked dinner companions the other evening.

They are gracious, among the most informed people, came from humble backgrounds, and have influenced the public and private lives of uncounted probably hundreds of millions of people (no hype intended with the estimate). Their work has likely affected your life.

Their lives illustrate a continuing demonstration of social contributions to civilization by people with special gifts and talents.

“It takes a lot of hard work, … (but) We’ll never know,” one companion concluded.

That’s a good answer. These people and their families can attest to long days of focused attention over decades in preparation and on-the-job to make their contributions. Their efforts appear consistent with descriptions of the lives of other major contributors.

They are individual doers. Missing from their discussions is any hint of dependence on luck, natural selection, special treatment, or other ways beyond their control to account for their contributions. They critique themselves privately and trust others to do the same.

I learned these lessons from gifted people, including my dinner companions:

1. Do things constantly to be the best at whatever you do, do them the best you can, and enjoy that you are doing them.

2. Work hard, alsways by keeping focused on doing your best through and around interruptions, delays, fatigue, and other events that divert other people from contributing as you do.

3. Accept responsibility for your performance and consequences that follow, learning from your mistakes in order to increase the value of contributions you have yet to make.

I wonder how much the simplicity of lessons of gifted people contributes to making giftedness? Now to relate the principle of simplicity to uses of Tablets in education.

 

Posted in Checklists, Gifted/Talented, Optoids, Teaching, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

aLEAP to Elements of Learning: Update # ??

aLEAP (a Learning Efficiency Analysis Paradigm) is under development to increase learning with Tablet and other mobile PCs.

This update summarizes responses from reviewers and adjustments to presentations of aLEAP. Adjustments reflect their comments.

Comments from Reviewers

Three sets of reviewers commented about aLEAP: educators, education software developers, and people I’ve asked for comments who have no interest in the project. In general, reviewers find descriptions of aLEAP too dense for quick review. Some have asked for more “friendly” presentations.

Educators in a public school district have used and distributed lesson planning guides based on aLEAP. These products have received mixed reviews ranging from ignoring them to pinning them up in classrooms for reference. The Enhanced Daily Learning Plan was seen attached to classroom walls and in the school district office. A student of one teacher made an eight foot banner featuring the five generic elements of aLEAP for confirming that learning occurred. The teacher attached the banner to a wall above the chalk/whiteboard. Students told the teacher they used these elements to study for tests.

With teachers, we are developing and testing formats based on aLEAP for planning, instructing and evaluating lessons.

An education software developer offered to license for distribution specific products based on aLEAP. Other developers monitor progress of the project.

Other people who have heard or read descriptions of aLEAP do not find it useful or of interest. Many have said in one way or another, “Nobody cares” or “Glad you have a hobby.”

Adjustments in Presentations

A website still under construction includes detailed descriptions of aLEAP. It consists of 200 pages of detailed descriptions, references, and notes as a wiki based online textbook. No launch date for the site has been set yet.

As technical descriptions change, summaries of aLEAP also change. These changes have lead to drafting separate “user friendly” descriptions for people who prefer such references.

Personal Observations

The use of the word learning has again become common in schools, in news/commentary media, and in gossip. It’s easy to speculate that most people know what it means to learn.

After all, we all learn. Billions of dollars are spent annually to encourage it. People spend careers studying it and trying to make it happen. But, can we say how it happens?

So I ask, how do you answer the question I was asked, “Tell me what people do step-by-step to learn that I can observe. Keep it simple.”

By inference, the questioner asked, “What is learning and what are its smallest easily observable elements without which people do not learn?”

I could not come up with a research based answer that held general agreement.

So, I started developing aLEAP as a response to the question. It’s based in part on descriptions of and conversations about Decisive Schools as represented in NESI (the New Era School Initiative). I give priority to what people do to learn rather than to the content of what they learn.

This focus has evolved into a structural-functional description of a research based infrastructure of learning. This approach includes a legacy of critiques of structural-functionalism in the social and behavioral sciences.

Learning

Behaviorists generally use the working definition of learning as the process of changing behavior patterns. Observers can note learners adopting, adapting, or extending these patterns. aLEAP is based on such definitions and observations.

aLEAP

aLEAP is a technical description of learning. It consists of 15 essential elements of behavior patterns people use to learn. All elements have empirical research legacies traceable over more than a century.

Experimental empirical behavioral researchers described these elements in ways for observers to measure their frequencies. Analysts use these frequencies to predict the likelihood of learning occuring. Scientists identified and described elements in laboratories and used them in practical settings to change behavior patterns.

aLEAP is an arrangement of these elements into a sequence that studies indicate people use to learn. Without an element occuring in a lesson or other presentation, people are less likely to learn from it.

Elements of Learning. Each of the 15 elements indicates a choice people make to try to learn. The choice either leads to changing a behavior pattern or it does not.

Therefore, each choice changes the likelihood of a learner reaching a criterion for learning, say, a lesson a teacher offers.

Some of the elements indicate categories of discrete choices. Others indicate generic choices that occur in a variety of expressions.

All are observable and measurable without special equipment.

Together, they describe one step from another in the most efficient sequence people use to learn.

Reaction to aLEAP. An early draft of aLEAP first appeared publically on June 22, 2009. It seemed simple then to state what was to me obvious.

I expected readers, especially educators with advanced degrees and education software developers, to say, “Of course. Tell me something I don’t know.”

That happened, but not from as many people as I expected.

Other educators and developers respond with various versions of “Oh? I don’t believe it. Too simple. Anyway, what’s in it for me? I’m busy.”

Rereading the original post now, it appears as a statement of intent needing further explanation. Development has continued to refine descriptions of elements of learning and to describe how to use these elements to plan and instruct lessons.

Remaining Questions to Address

The biggest question that remains: What presentations of aLEAP do educators and education software developers consider “friendly” enough to get beyond their automatic rejection of facts that learning is a technical process? Many of these people appear to believe that learning occurs, so don’t try to describe it. Don’t pretend anyone can describe it as a formula, algorithm, or other mechanical process. Above all, do not try to replace my professional expertise with non-human ways to create what you call learning.

Demonstrating advantages of aLEAP to educators and to those who distribute learning material to schools poses an equal challenge. aLEAP is learning process centered. Most education programs are learning content centered under a variety of names. Advantages to educators and distributors must overcome the question, “What’s in it for me?” instead of “What’s in it for learners?”

Your comments about aLEAP and its development are solicited and welcome. Thanks for taking time to review this update.

References

Heiny, R. Accelerated K-12 Mobile Learning: Press Release, Tablet PC Education Blog, February 13, 2009. (Captured July 1, 2011, 10:40 AM.)

Heiny, R. aLEAP Toward Automatic Learning Analysis with Tablet PCs Abstract, Tablet PC Education Blog, June 22, 2009. (Captured June 29, 2011, 4:42 PM.)

Heiny, R. Decisive Schools, Tablet PC Education Blog, A category of posts on various dates beginning March 28, 2005. (Captured July 1, 2011, 10:58 AM.)

Heiny, R. & Heiny, L.P. Enhanced Daily Learning Plan, Tablet PC Education Blog, December 28, 2009. (Captured June 30, 2011, 10:27 AM.)

Heiny, R. New Era School Initiative (NESI). Tablet PC Education Blog, A category of posts beginning February 13, 2009. (Captured July 1, 2011, 10:55.)

 

Posted in Accountability, aLEAP, Learning, Learning Efficiency, Lesson Plans, Mobile PC Learning, Mobile PCs in Schools, Teaching | Leave a comment

7 Signs You May Be Rationing Learning

A good teacher provides students with (1) direction, tools and time to learn efficiently; (2) a challenging, engaging, and rewarding setting whether in a classroom, tobacco barn or under the sky; and (3) temporary isolation from daily distractions and diversions not directly relevant to the lesson.

Notice that these conditions do not say, “Make learning harder, more complex, or more time consuming than is necessary to reach a specific learning criterion for each lesson.” That’s because  dysfunctional teachers do that.

Most of us have seen and some of us have been one of those dysfunctional teachers, at least temporarily, at one time or another. That means we used our own reasons for arguing against ideas and practices which we did not fulfill. Those arguments also resulted in rationing  learning by consuming time we could have used to refine our instruction.

If you want to increase the efficiency of learning by students in your classes, they’ll get there faster by doing the Antedote and not the dysfunctional teacher practices made bold. The quicker learners reach criterion, they more you can teach them to do.

1. Give incomplete and indirect direction and expect learners to read your mind. You’re in a hurry again today. You haven’t taken time to plan a lesson. You have a few key words in mind and a vague mental image of how your high school math teacher conducted this lesson. It didn’t go well for you then, but you believe you can make it more fun for your students today. You decide to hold a class discussion about the topic or maybe hand out worksheets. After all, they can look up the content of a good lesson online with their Tablet PCs or smartphones. Your time is important to you. Why should you take more of it to write down a lesson plan when you can “wing-it” with OK results?

Antedote: There’s never an acceptable excuse for wasting the time of students in your classroom because of your incomplete direction or preparation. Reasons, yes, but they are not sufficient to wipe away what students could have learned, if you were fully prepared. Write a lesson plan before facing students assigned to you. That will at least give you something to fall back on the next time you offer this lesson and you don’t take time to adapt it into your ideal session.

2. Stay comfortable and don’t upset anyone. You’re a professional!

Don’t make waves with students assigned to your classroom. Keep your head down so nobody complains to you. Continue doing what you’ve been doing. You believe you have the right answers for your teaching. After all, teachers are different. You have a wonderful life with a steady income that pays your household expenses plus some perks. Don’t rock the boat. At the same time, figure out with other teachers how to neutralize the hotshot teacher with new ideas. They could threaten your job security, if those ideas catch on. Remember: Never “foul your own nest” or let someone else foul it with something you don’t understand or believe.

Antedote: Challenge yourself to learn how to do and to critique what “the hotshot” does in class. Test it in one of your classes. If you’re adventurous, talk with your supervisor about your challenge and results. This is how people show that they’re trying to stay current in their field.

3. Keep on keeping on. It’s just another PD session about another fad. This too shall pass.

Don’t forget to take your knitting or some papers to correct when you attend professional development sessions. Oh, and don’t forget to message someone on your smartphone or Tablet! These sessions are perfect for messaging. You already know what and how to teach. You prepared to teach. You like teaching. The state gave you a license to teach, and you
already try hard when you teach. Really, no one could reasonably expect more of you. You shouldn’t have to endure the indignity of another PD sermon by an outside expert. They just want you to use their websites and buy their books.

Antedote: Set a goal for each PD session to learn one new vocabulary word and how to use it. If you’re really adventurous, try two new words. If unsure, ask the speaker to describe how best to use that word to adjust your instruction so students in your classes increase their learning more than they now perform. Ask for support from the expert.

4. Let the school board take the heat for your school’s reputation. They’re elected to do so. You’re selected to do what they allow you to do: teach.

They’re responsible for the quality of your school, not you. They hire the administrators who make the curriculum and sort of sometimes enforce it. You need the paycheck they give you. But, don’t let anyone tell you what to do with students in your classroom. Anyway, administrators get paid too much and there are too many of them. The board
should do something about that before they try to make me take the fall for board
and administrative failures!

Antedote: Stand and deliver what you agreed to do regardless of what others do! You know letting the school board take the heat is bogus reasoning. They hired you, unless you are saying that action was bogus too. You also know the sermon about your contracted duties to increase learning by students assigned to learn from you. Focus on what you do best: teach.

5. Don’t critique or deliver bad news to your students.

They already have a hard life. Their previous teachers passed them on to you, so they must be doing something right. Support that. Make your classroom a sanctuary from pressures to perform. Be their friend. After all, you don’t believe the state has any right to impose all that standards stuff on you or them anyway. It’s your judgment and your standards in your classroom with your students that matter. Not what students in elite private schools or
in Singapore or some other place are lerning to do.

Antedote: Change advisors to at least one who is in tune with the changing ecosystem of education and public schooling. Be straight forward and direct with students. Tell them what they are expected to do and how to do it successfully and efficiently in each lesson. Give them goals that require them to stretch rapidly toward what the most informed people know and do. It’s probably your contracted duty to instruct, to correct, and to show learners how to do so in order to avoid academic performance errors.

6. Ignore suggestions from others about ways you can adjust your lessons that will likely increase learning by students assigned to you.

Ignore similar suggestions for at least the first three or four times to find out if you really must pay attention. After that, adopt some of the words and phrases from suggestions in order to describe what you already do. Cite exceptions to their suggestions, no matter how unlikely those are to occur. What you’re saying by doing this: You are doing what is more
important to you than the likelihood that students assigned to you will learn more
of what is possible for them to learn.

Antedote: This is a reasonable position to take, if you are perfect and students whom you teach earn perfect scores on third party exams. Failing either condition, prepare for more suggestions and competition from inside and outside the academy. Some educators as well as education software and hardware developers have products available and are ramping up more that replace your instruction. Yes, replace even if you argue, “Never!” Learners using these products outperform students of teachers with dysfunctional practices in schools. You will likely at some point find that this competition makes you uncomfortable enough to adapt your teaching or you will retire from teaching one way or another.

7.    Give priority to your beliefs over students in your classes earning adequate scores on third party tests.

Assert that you have the right to use your religious freedom to determine what your students will learn, even when that right is not in your contract, the content has not been
approved by the school board, or what you teach repeatedly results in students earning unacceptable scores on state achievement tests. Don’t be a doormat. Don’t let the district walk all over you. Make them take you to court and prove that you don’t have a right to this expression of your religious freedom with public school students. If you don’t insist on expressing your beliefs, it’s all downhill for believers.

Antedote: If your beliefs preclude you from teaching only what school administrators and the school board approve, hire a good attorney in contract, education, and  constitution law to review your rights and obligations under your contract, including Federal court opinions in related disputes. Ask the attorney to determine if students assigned to you are “your students” or if that term is jargon that gives you no right to claim ownership of their time and activities in your classroom. Consult with your
union’s policy and legal affairs national offices to clarify the potential impact of this dispute on your career. Make sure your family is prepared for the public scrutiny of your and their lives that may occur. If you still decide to proceed, we wish you and your family all the best.

The prudent step to take instead of the dysfunctional ones is to challenge yourself to instruct students in ways that result in them increasingly earning scores in the top percentiles on standardized tests. Adapt your instruction to that end.

The rapidly changing ecosystem of education and public school demands that level of performance. Perform like a good teacher. Demonstrate that students who learn from you increasingly earn top academic performance scores. Then, you will not be seen as a “dysfunctional teacher” who rations learning.

Reference

Heiny, R. Teachers’ Conflicts of Interest Ration Learning: NESI Conversation 11, Tablet PC Education Blog, August 24, 2009. (Captured June 28, 2009, 4:40 PM.)

Posted in Accountability, Checklists, New Era School Initiative (NESI), Teaching | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Three Ways to Extend Active Directory

As schools adopt more cloud applications, extending Active Directory to the cloud is increasingly important. This enables your school to increase control by providing single sign-on with delegated authentication and automated account provisioning.

This live bewinar covers the merits and provides starting points for the three ways cloud applications can be integrated with Active Directory.

Event Date: Wednesday, June 9, 2011, at 11:00am PT/2:00 ET.

<a href=”Registerhttp://redmondmag.com/webcasts/2011/06/okta-june-29.aspx?tc=page0&pc=c524em06&utm_source=webmktg&utm_medium=E-Mail&utm_campaign=c524em06″>Register</a>.

(When you register, your name will be entered into a drawing for a $100 gift card at Amazon.)

Posted in Checklists, Mobile PC Context, Mobile PC Educator, Mobile PCs in Schools, Podcasts Webcasts Webinars | Tagged | Leave a comment

10 Things Teachers Should Never Say – To Themselves

Are you your own worst enemy as a teacher? Let’s make sure you aren’t.

Here are 10 things teachers and other educators should never say to themselves. They’re all about you, not about increasing learning by your students. They sound like self-pity. They consume time and energy that you could use to do more with what you have to increase student learning now.

1. I deserve more than they are paying me. Maybe so in an ideal world. Most people do. But by the contract you signed, you only deserve what you agreed to accept. Reserve the argument for contract negotiations. Spend your time today refining lesson plans and instruction, so you can demonstrate that your students earned more academic achievement than with other teachers.

2. I just need more time, and then I could have … Maybe you’re correct. But you also could edit more carefully what you do until you have the time you want for another activity that increases student learning.

3. I deserve recognition for my preparation, expertise, and sacrifices. I am a professional. Yes, teaching is one among many professions. You signed a contract to use your skills in the service sector of the economy. Those who hired you recognized your preparation and expertise. They continue to recognize it by paying you. Keep up the good work, so you can qualify for recognition of academic results by students who benefitted from your skills!

4. I never learn anything from so called experts that administrators hire for our professional development. Yes, many teachers say this. Few can demonstrate that all students in all of their classes exceed minimum state standards. If your models of planning and instruction are consistent with what learners do to learn, and students with whom you work exceed standards, then volunteer to offer professional development sessions that show others how to accomplish the same.

5. My students are loyal. They like me! That makes me happy. Congratulations. It’s good to hear positive comments. Suggestion: Ask yourself what your students gain from your teaching beyond their self-interest and how you can use it to increase their academic gain?

6. I trust my experience to know when my students learn what they should from me. You should trust your experience. You should also be skeptical enough to check your judgment against your employer’s standards. Great teachers extend trust and also follow-up to identify how much confidence to have in that judgment. Demonstrate that you are trying to be a great teacher who provides objective evidence of student academic accomplishments first and foremost.

7. My classes are one big happy family. Good! How does that work out for each student’s academic achievement? Has anyone exceeded your expectations? Have the brightest students excelled beyond their expectations? As teacher, not social worker, you were hired to increase each of their academic performances to meet at least minimum state standards. All else are means, not ends. Sounds harsh? Maybe, but you know it’s accurate.

8. I’m just like other teachers: hard working, professional, … Teaching is a little like being a celebrity: you don’t know everyone, but they know you, at least by the stereotype they hold of you. Never say, “I’m no more important than others in the school.” To say so abdicates your contracted authority and responsibility for the students enrolled in your classes now. That time gives you a chance to earn more importance to them than to others during the clock time students are with you.

9. I’m a member of a professional team. We work together. That’s good. No, that’s not good, if you replace your initiative with students assigned to you with a teamwork image. The test of good or not good is whether or not your teamwork results in your students increasing their academic performance to meet or exceed state standards.

10. I just don’t buy into standardized testing for meeting state standards. They don’t test what I teach. It’s a waste of valuable classroom time that I could use in better ways with my students. Learning opportunities are valuable. So is confirming that certain minimum learning you contracted to teach has occurred. Standardized tests are the fairest, not perfect, way yet devised to demonstrate the extent to which students have learned or exceeded these minimums. After all, a 100% score by a student on a state standards test equals a grade of “C” (average). Show your students how to earn that grade or better.

Do you agree with never saying these 10 things to yourself? What do you think should not be in this list?

Your ideas will help me connect this post to teaching and learning with Tablet PCs.

Posted in Accountability, Checklists, Learning Centered Attention, Teaching | Tagged | Leave a comment

Requesting Permission to Teach: A Principle of Learning

I’ve been trying various ways to relate aLEAP (a Learning Efficiency Analysis Paradigm) to conventional practices of teachers in schools. Drafts of aLEAP are technical descriptions of learning based on experimental empirical behavioral science research.

I also want aLEAP to be useful for developing educational software for Tablets. That requires more precision than in conventional descriptions of teacher practices.

Several people have told me I need to write “more teacher friendly.” I’m not sure what that means.

Software developers have told me that they don’t have time to learn the behavioral science of learning, not even the summaries in aLEAP. They have asked me to boil it down to the essential specifications of learning. They can program those specs.

So, I ask, “Is the following principle of learning from a learners’ view more friendly? Is it a useful example of how I should describe more of aLEAP?”

Requesting Permission to Teach You

From a learners’ view (ALV), good teachers ask permission from learners to instruct a lesson. Requesting permission infers an offer to learners of something teachers consider of value. In exchange, teachers ask for some of learners’ time, effort, and other personal resources.

Learners grant permission when they attend to a lesson. They rescind and deny permission when they do not learn the lesson. That means they attend to something other than to the critical variables during the lesson.

Ways Teachers Request Permission

The principle of requesting permission to teach (RPT) is another way of saying what Madeline C. Hunter calls “a hook” in her model for teaching. Robert Gagne calls it “gaining attention.” Teachers talking about their teaching just say something like, “get their attention.”

aLEAP of Permission

In aLEAP, the principle of RPT refines “hooks,” etc. to measurable empirical units. It uses the assumption that learners decide when they will learn.

That assumption is consistent with behavioral science findings used to identify aLEAP Stage 2 (What Happens Immediately before Learning). That stage includes descriptions of the hierarchy of to what learners attend first, second, etc.

RPT is also consistent with common practices of sales people in stores who ask, “May I help you?” It’s also consistent with requesting permission to come aboard a ship, denying permission by discarding “junk mail,” and hanging up on unwanted telephone call solicitors.

Thank you for granting me permission to tell you something in this post that you might find of value. Was the style more friendly?

Related Resources

Gagner, R. & Driscoll, M. (1988). Events of instruction. In Essentials of Learning for Instruction (2nd Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Heiny, R. aLEAP

Hunter, M.C. 7 Step Lesson Planning, (Captured June 11, 2011, 11:03 AM)

(6-12-11 7:39 AM Minor edits to text.)

Posted in aLEAP, Learning Centered Attention, Teaching | 2 Comments

BenchPrep App Provides Social Test Preparation

BenchPrep released a free cross-platform test preparation and learning app.

The app features use of material for tests including the SAT, GRE, LSAT, GMAT, and MCAT.

It also allows students to review material, take practice tests, use flashcards, see progress reports, chat with peers and compare performances.

Study material are available for purchase. Yep, that’s life :)

BenchPrep

Posted in Learning Content, Mobile PC Context, Sources | Leave a comment